In This Article
- What Is ePLAN Toronto?
- Which Projects Use ePLAN?
- Account Setup & Project Registration
- Drawing Standards for ePLAN Submission
- Structural Drawing Requirements
- Supporting Documents Checklist
- Submitting a Complete Application
- The Review Process & Timelines
- Responding to Reviewer Comments
- Resubmission Process
- Common Rejection Reasons
- Frequently Asked Questions
What Is ePLAN Toronto?
ePLAN (Electronic Plan Review) is the City of Toronto's web-based portal for submitting building permit applications, uploading drawings and supporting documents, tracking review status, and receiving formal comments and approvals — all electronically. The system replaced Toronto Building's traditional paper-based over-the-counter submissions for most commercial, institutional, and multi-residential permit types.
The platform is built on ProjectDox (Avolve Software), the same platform used by numerous major North American municipalities. Applicants, their consultants (architect, structural engineer, mechanical engineer), and the building department's plan reviewers all interact through the same project environment, with all comments, markups, and responses recorded in a permanent audit trail.
Which Projects Use ePLAN?
Toronto Building currently requires ePLAN for:
- All new Building Permit applications for Part 3 buildings (major occupancy buildings, generally >600 m² or >3 storeys)
- Part 3 alteration permits involving structural, mechanical, or architectural changes requiring full plan review
- Designated complex Part 9 residential projects as determined by Toronto Building
- Some conditional/phased permits for large developments (foundation-only permits, early site preparation)
Small Part 9 residential alterations (basement lowering, additions, interior renovations in houses) may still be processed at the Building Permit counter at a civic centre or through Toronto Building's online minor residential portal. When in doubt, the safest approach is to let your engineer or permit consultant confirm the correct submission pathway before drawings are finalized.
Authorized Filing Setup & Project Registration
- Authorize the filing team: The usual path is for the owner to authorize Asvakas or another permit consultant to manage the ePLAN account and filing workflow on the project's behalf.
- Register the project: The filing team completes the project registration with the property address, project description, building area, number of storeys, occupancy type, and estimated construction value.
- Complete and attach the application: The City's Building Permit application form is prepared with the owner or authorized agent's signature and uploaded as part of the project registration package.
- Upload Schedule 1: The Schedule 1 (Designer information and general review commitment) is coordinated with the required professionals and uploaded with the initial submission.
Drawing Standards for ePLAN Submission
Toronto Building specifies drawing standards in its ePLAN Drawing Standards document (available on toronto.ca/building). Key requirements:
- Format: PDF (PDF/A-1b preferred for archival quality). No AutoCAD DWG, TIFF, or other formats
- Paper size: Standard architectural/engineering sheet — 36×48 inches (914×1219 mm) or 24×36 inches (610×914 mm) for smaller drawings
- File size: Maximum 50 MB per PDF file. Large drawing sets should be split into multiple files per the Drawing Naming Standard
- Text legibility: Text must be legible at 2.5 mm minimum height when printed at actual drawing size
- File naming: Files must follow ePLAN's Drawing Naming Standard — a specific alphanumeric code format identifying drawing discipline, revision status, and sheet number
Structural Drawing Requirements
For a complete structural submission through ePLAN, the following drawings and documents are required:
| Drawing/Document | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Structural Foundation Plan | Shows all footings, piles, grade beams at ≥1:100 scale with dimensions, bearing pressures, pile loads |
| Structural Framing Plans (each floor + roof) | All beams, columns, slabs, openings, member sizes, and connection references at ≥1:100 scale |
| Structural Sections & Details | Typical and critical connection details, reinforcing details, anchor bolt plans at ≥1:20 scale |
| Structural Design Notes / Cover Sheet | Design basis (codes, loads, material specs), general notes, abbreviations, engineer's stamp |
| Geotechnical Report | Soil investigation report by a geotechnical engineer, referenced in structural drawings |
| Structural Calculations | Submitted on request — not always uploaded initially but must be available for reviewer's request |
| P.Eng. Stamp & Signature | Digital stamp and signature (or wet stamp on scanned PDFs) on each structural drawing sheet |
Digital seals: Toronto Building accepts digitally-applied P.Eng. seals on ePLAN submissions. The seal must include the engineer's licence number, name, and the phrase "Licensed to practise professional engineering in Ontario." PEO's guidelines on digital seals (PEO Guideline GP-C-008) govern the acceptable formats.
Supporting Documents Checklist
- Completed building permit application form (signed by owner or agent)
- Schedule 1 — Designer information (signed by all required professionals)
- Survey/site plan showing property boundaries, existing structures, and proposed work
- Architectural drawings (floor plans, elevations, sections) — from the architect
- Structural drawings (as above)
- Mechanical, electrical drawings where applicable
- Geotechnical report for foundation work
- Energy compliance documentation (SB-10 or OBC Div. B Part 11 energy where applicable)
- Heritage permit (if within a Heritage Conservation District or on the Heritage Register)
- Conservation Authority clearance letter (if within a regulated area such as TRCA jurisdiction)
Submitting a Complete Application
Within the ePLAN portal, the permit team coordinates uploads, consultant deliverables, and final submission to Toronto Building. When Asvakas manages the structural filing, we organize the package, confirm the required documents are ready, and trigger the formal submission workflow with the owner's authorization.
The intake review confirms that all required documents are present and sets the permit fee. Incomplete submissions are returned with a deficiency list, and the formal technical review does not begin until Toronto Building accepts the application as complete.
The Review Process & Timelines
Once a complete submission is accepted, Toronto Building assigns the application to the relevant discipline reviewers — typically separate reviewers for zoning/planning, architectural code compliance, structural, mechanical, and building administration. Each reviewer works independently and posts their comments to the ePLAN portal, which the filing team then tracks and answers.
Toronto Building publishes service standards for complete applications, but the actual review period depends on project complexity, required agency coordination, current review volume, and how many rounds of comments must be resolved before issuance.
Responding to Reviewer Comments
Structural comments from Toronto Building's plan reviewer will reference specific OBC clauses, drawing deficiencies, or requests for additional information. Best practices for responding:
- Address every comment — reviewers track that each comment has been resolved; unanswered comments will result in re-comment on the same issue
- Provide a written response document listing each comment number and the resolution — this is separate from revised drawings
- Where a comment is incorrect or the design is compliant by an alternate means, provide a written justification referencing the specific OBC clause supporting the design approach
- Revised drawings must increment the revision number and update the revision cloud and delta on the affected sheets
Resubmission Process
All resubmissions go through the ePLAN portal. In practice, the engineer or permit consultant uploads the revised drawings and response document together, tracks comment closure, and coordinates any follow-up agency sign-offs. Multi-cycle review is common on complex projects, so owners are better served by having the filing team manage that process rather than trying to administer it themselves.
Common Rejection Reasons
| Issue | Prevention |
|---|---|
| Missing P.Eng. stamp on structural drawings | Verify every sheet is stamped before upload. Review PDF page by page. |
| Drawings not drawn to stated scale | Print a test sheet at stated scale and verify spot dimensions match before submission |
| Missing geotechnical report | Have the geotechnical engineer issue report before structural drawings are finalized, not after |
| Foundation design inconsistent with geotech recommendations | Structural engineer must review and explicitly reference the geotech report in the structural notes |
| Schedule 1 missing structural engineer's signature | Confirm Schedule 1 is fully executed before submission initiation |
| File naming non-compliant with ePLAN Drawing Naming Standard | Download current ePLAN Drawing Naming Standard from toronto.ca/building — update as the standard changes |
| Missing live load tables or code basis | Structural cover sheet must state design codes, design loads (live, snow, wind, seismic) and material specs |
Frequently Asked Questions
ePLAN is Toronto Building's electronic portal for submitting building permit applications, uploading drawings, tracking review status, and receiving digital comments and approvals. In most projects, the owner authorizes the engineer or permit consultant to manage that workflow. Asvakas can prepare the structural package, coordinate uploads, and handle reviewer comments through the platform.
Toronto Building requires ePLAN for all new building permit applications for Part 3 buildings (commercial, multi-residential, institutional — generally more than 3 storeys or 600 m²) and most Part 3 alteration permits. Some complex Part 9 residential projects are also directed to ePLAN. Smaller residential alterations typically use in-person counter submission or the city's minor residential online portal.
Structural drawings for ePLAN must be submitted as PDFs (PDF/A preferred), sized at 36×48 or 24×36 inches, with text legible at 2.5 mm when printed. Each sheet must carry the P.Eng.'s digital or wet stamp. Files must be named per Toronto Building's ePLAN Drawing Naming Standard. Geotechnical reports must be uploaded as separate PDFs.
ePLAN review timing depends on whether the application is accepted as complete at intake, the size and complexity of the project, and the number of resubmission cycles needed to close review comments. The best approach is to have your permit team track the live file status and coordinate reviewer responses so the submission does not stall between cycles.
The most common ePLAN structural rejection reasons are: missing P.Eng. stamp on drawings; drawings not to stated scale; missing geotechnical report; foundation design inconsistent with geotechnical recommendations; unsigned Schedule 1; incorrect ePLAN file naming; and missing design load information on the structural cover sheet. A complete pre-submission checklist review prevents most of these.
Toronto ePLAN Structural Engineering Services
Asvakas Engineering prepares OBC-compliant, ePLAN-ready structural drawing packages for commercial, residential, and mixed-use projects in Toronto — including general review and Schedule 2 services through construction completion.
Get a Quote for Your ePLAN Project